Higher Test Marks with Free Online AIGP Exam Practice

CASE STUDY

Please use the following answer the next question:

XYZ Corp., a premier payroll services company that employs thousands of people globally, is embarking on a

new hiring campaign and wants to implement policies and procedures to identify and retain the best talent. The

new talent will help the company's product team expand its payroll offerings to companies in the healthcare

and transportation sectors, including in Asia.

It has become time consuming and expensive for HR to review all resumes, and they are concerned that human

reviewers might be susceptible to bias.

Address these concerns, the company is considering using a third-party Al tool to screen resumes and assist

with hiring. They have been talking to several vendors about possibly obtaining a third-party Al-enabled hiring

solution, as long as it would achieve its goals and comply with all applicable laws.

The organization has a large procurement team that is responsible for the contracting of technology solutions.

One of the procurement team's goals is to reduce costs, and it often prefers lower-cost solutions. Others within

the company are responsible for integrating and deploying technology solutions into the organization's

operations in a responsible, cost-effective manner.

The organization is aware of the risks presented by Al hiring tools and wants to mitigate them. It also

questions how best to organize and train its existing personnel to use the Al hiring tool responsibly. Their

concerns are heightened by the fact that relevant laws vary across jurisdictions and continue to change.

The frameworks that would be most appropriate for XYZ's governance needs would be the NIST Al Risk

Management Framework and?

According to November 2023 White House Executive Order, which of the following best describes the guidance given to governmental agencies on the use of generative Al as a workplace tool?

CASE STUDY

Please use the following answer the next question:

A local police department in the United States procured an Al system to monitor and analyze social media

feeds, online marketplaces and other sources of public information to detect evidence of illegal activities (e.g.,

sale of drugs or stolen goods). The Al system works by surveilling the public sites in order to identify

individuals that are likely to have committed a crime. It cross-references the individuals against data

maintained by law enforcement and then assigns a percentage score of the likelihood of criminal activity based

on certain factors like previous criminal history, location, time, race and gender.

The police department retained a third-party consultant assist in the procurement process, specifically to

evaluate two finalists. Each of the vendors provided information about their system's accuracy rates, the

diversity of their training data and how their system works. The consultant determined that the first vendor’s

system has a higher accuracy rate and based on this information, recommended this vendor to the police

department.

The police department chose the first vendor and implemented its Al system. As part of the implementation,

the department and consultant created a usage policy for the system, which includes training police officers on

how the system works and how to incorporate it into their investigation process.

The police department has now been using the Al system for a year. An internal review has found that every

time the system scored a likelihood of criminal activity at or above 90%, the police investigation subsequently

confirmed that the individual had, in fact, committed a crime. Based on these results, the police department wants to forego investigations for cases where the Al system gives a score of at least 90% and proceed directly

with an arrest.

The best human oversight mechanism for the police department to implement is that a police officer should?

Which of the following is the least relevant consideration in assessing whether users should be given the right to opt out from an Al system?

CASE STUDY

A global marketing agency is adapting a large language model ("LLM") to generate content for an upcoming

marketing campaign for a client's new product: a hard hat designed for construction workers of any gender to

better protect them from head injuries.

The marketing agency is accessing the LLM through an application programming interface ("API") developed

by a third-party technology company. They want to generate text to be used for targeted advertising

communications that highlight the benefits of the hard hat to potential purchasers. Both the marketing agency

and the technology company have taken reasonable steps to address Al governance. The marketing company has:

• Entered into a contract with the technology company with suitable representations and warranties.

• Completed an impact assessment on the LLM for this intended use.

• Built technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.

• Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.

• Followed applicable regulatory requirements.

• Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the use of the Al on its client's advertising.

The technology company has:

• Provided guidance and resources to developers to address environmental concerns.

• Build technical guidance on how to measure and mitigate bias in the LLM.

• Provided tools and resources to measure bias specific to the LLM.

• Enabled technical aspects of transparency, explainability, robustness and privacy.

• Mapped and mitigated potential societal harms and large-scale impacts.

• Followed applicable regulatory requirements and industry standards.

• Created specific legal statements and disclosures regarding the LLM. including with respect to IP and

rights to data.

The technology company has also addressed environmental concerns and societal harms.

Which of the following results would be considered biased outputs from this AI system EXCEPT?