Question 1

Which of the following is an important testability consideration when designing a SUT?

Options :

A : Controllability

B : Interoperability

C : Transportability

D : Maintainability

Answer: A

Question 2

What can be a consequence of poor test structuring in automated test cases?

Options :

A : Test results will be difficult to interpret and analyze

B : Redundant test cases can increase execution time without providing additional value

C : All test cases will pass regardless of their structure

D : Tests will run faster and require less system resources

Answer: B

Question 3

SOLID principles It is an acronym of what?

Options :

A : Single responsibility, open-closed, Liskov substitution, interface substitution, dependency inversion

B : Single responsibility, open-extension, Liskov substitution, interface substitution, dependency inversion

C : Single responsibility, open-closed, Liskov substitution, interface substitution, dependency version

D : Single responsibility, open-closed, Liskov segregation, interface substitution, dependency version

Answer: A

Question 4

Working on a test automation project, you are creating business scenarios that will be automated for usage by the user acceptance testers during UAT. During UAT, the well-defined business scenarios are repeated frequently. By carrying out the test automation, the objective is to be able to test these identical scenarios as part of regression testing.

The library of functions that the test automation can use has already been developed using structured scripting. Which kind of scripting should be applied to expand on the previously completed structured scripting and execute this test automation in order to achieve the desired business outcomes?

Options :

A : Keyword-driven scripting

B : Scenario-driven scripting

C : Linear scripting

D : Data-Driven scripting

Answer: B

Question 5

You are testing a major upgrade to the user interface for Land navigation control. Large-scale automated regression, performance, and security testing has been set up in pre-production test environment. Regression testing has a limited window of time, and it must be finished successfully with no significant regressions before non-functional testing can start.

You have been running the automated regression test suite in a single overnight run using the same version of the Test Automation Suite (TAS) for the past few releases. But you think there's a chance the test suite won't complete overnight because of the most recent changes made to the System Under Test (SUT), which could cause performance and security testing to be delayed.

Which option would be the BEST and MOST cost-efficient approach to mitigate this risk?

Options :

A : Create a mirror of the pre-production test environment and split the regression test suite to run in parallel across the environments

B : Introduce better coding practices for the automation scripts, including coding guidelines, reviews, and improved static analysis

C : Split the regression test suite into multiple parts, running in the environment across consecutive nights

D : Analyse the regression test suite and remove test coverage duplication and redundancy

Answer: A

Higher Test Marks with Free Online CTAL-TAE_V2 Exam Practice

Buying Options: